AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR232006_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAR232006_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR232006_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied (physical p. 7). Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR232006_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied (physical p. 7). The record did not establish at least three criteria. It included a medal/award claim, memberships, published materials, contributions, authorship and performance-related evidence; the AAO found the evidence insufficient to show qualifying recognition/impact, field-level acclaim, or the required distinction. The final page concludes the petitioner did not distinguish himself from others in the field and lacked sustained acclaim (pp. 2–7).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR232006_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 23, 2006

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A arts; self-represented musician/composer; AAO appeal of Form I-140 denial.

Procedural posture

Appeal of service-center denial; full merits review of extraordinary-ability criteria.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed; petition denied (physical p. 7).

Final-merits status

Aggregate conclusion reached: record did not establish sustained national/international acclaim or distinction at the top of the field (p. 7).

What the AAO decision addressed

The record did not establish at least three criteria. It included a medal/award claim, memberships, published materials, contributions, authorship and performance-related evidence; the AAO found the evidence insufficient to show qualifying recognition/impact, field-level acclaim, or the required distinction. The final page concludes the petitioner did not distinguish himself from others in the field and lacked sustained acclaim (pp. 2–7).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Award evidence did not show nationally/internationally recognized excellence (pp. 2–3). — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association memberships did not establish outstanding achievement judged by recognized experts (pp. 3–4). — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Material did not establish qualifying major-media coverage about the petitioner and his work (pp. 4–5). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Record did not demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field (pp. 5–6). — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Citations use physical PDF page numbers; pages were visually inspected in source order.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Older arts/music case may support a carefully labeled discussion of evidence for a musician/composer; identify the precise criterion lesson from the decision and preserve its 2006 context. Avoid treating it as current policy without a current-law cross-check. Potential individual case page; retain historical date and nonprecedent status.

Editorial use note: Potential individual case page; retain historical date and nonprecedent status.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR232006_01B2203