AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR222022_01B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision MAR222022_01B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision MAR222022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Director found judging, scholarly authorship, and leading/critical role met. AAO conducted final-merits review and found the totality did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing; appeal dismissed.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is a Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR222022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 22, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial of Form I-140; appeal dismissed after formal final-merits review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Formal final-merits determination reached: the totality of evidence did not establish sustained acclaim or that petitioner was among the small percentage at the top of the field.

What the AAO decision addressed

Director found judging, scholarly authorship, and leading/critical role met. AAO conducted final-merits review and found the totality did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing; appeal dismissed.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 2, p. 3

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met — p. 2, p. 3

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petitioner is a physical education specialist with degrees in physical education/exercise physiology and employment coordinating a pulmonary rehabilitation center laboratory.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Director accepted judging, scholarly authorship, and leading/critical role; AAO proceeded to a final-merits determination.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found the peer-review activities and publication/conference record did not show the petitioner was among the small percentage at the top or establish sustained acclaim; publications and conference presentations were considered in totality.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Letters about institutional work, associations, original research, and salary did not establish broader field recognition or top-of-field standing.; pages: 4; 5; 6

  • claim: After aggregate final-merits review, AAO found petitioner ineligible and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Teaching sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR222022_01B2203