AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR222013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR222013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The AAO’s operative order dismisses the appeal; the stated merits and procedural basis is summarized above with page citations.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision concerning an EB-1A Form I-140 petition and discusses eligibility for that classification.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR222013_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 22, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO nonprecedent decision on a Form I-140 petition for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability under INA § 203(b)(1)(A) (EB-1A). |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from denial of an EB-1A petition for a software developer working in computer graphics and garment simulation; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed; petition denied |
Final-merits status | The AAO concludes that the petitioner did not submit evidence satisfying three categories; a distinct final-merits determination is not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO’s operative order dismisses the appeal; the stated merits and procedural basis is summarized above with page citations.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | abandoned — p. 4 |
Membership | Not considered — p. 4 |
Published material about the person | Not considered — p. 4 |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — p. 4 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — p. 9 |
Artistic display or showcases | |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — p. 12 |
Commercial success in the performing arts |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petition was filed January 4, 2012 and identifies the petitioner as a 3D computer software developer working in character animation and cloth simulation.; evidence_pages: 2; 4
claim: The AAO finds the evidence insufficient for original contributions, display, leading/critical role, high salary and commercial success; it excludes post-filing evidence.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13
claim: The AAO dismisses the appeal.; evidence_pages: 15
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.