AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR222012_03B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision MAR222012_03B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision MAR222012_03B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR222012_03B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Counsel promised supporting documents/legal brief within 30 days in June 13, 2011 appeal and cover letter. About nine months later nothing had arrived; no specific argument addressed revocation grounds.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR222012_03B2203

Decision date as printed

March 22, 2012

Classification / field stated in source

Ship modeler

Procedural posture

Texas Service Center revoked EB-1A approval March 10, 2011; Director dismissed motion to reopen May 13, 2011; counsel appealed.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Counsel promised supporting documents/legal brief within 30 days in June 13, 2011 appeal and cover letter. About nine months later nothing had arrived; no specific argument addressed revocation grounds.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • No criterion merits decision.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover date March 22, 2012; Texas Service Center; EB-1A Form I-140.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director revoked approved petition March 10, 2011 and dismissed motion to reopen May 13, 2011; petitioner sought extraordinary-ability classification as a ship modeler.; pages: 2

  • claim: Counsel repeatedly promised brief/supporting documents within 30 days after June 13, 2011 appeal; about nine months later no additional material had arrived.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found no specific statement or argument addressing revocation and summarily dismissed appeal.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Revocation research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR222012_03B2203