AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision MAR212024_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; matter remanded for a new decision. Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for a new decision. Membership, judging, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role: unclear in AAO disposition. Director was said to have found judging and scholarly articles met and membership/leading role unmet, but AAO did not adopt those criterion findings because it could not tell whether RFE evidence was considered (pp. 1–2). Final merits not reached.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR212024_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 21, 2024 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner is an actress. |
Procedural posture | De novo appeal from Director denial. Petitioner claimed membership, judging, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role. Director stated both that at least three criteria were and were not met, and did not specify criteria or explain evidence; Director’s decision also mislabeled petitioner’s field as business/entrepreneurship rather than acting. AAO found it unclear whether RFE evidence had been considered and Remanded for complete record review and a new eligibility decision. |
Operative disposition | Director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for a new decision. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
Membership, judging, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role: unclear in AAO disposition. Director was said to have found judging and scholarly articles met and membership/leading role unmet, but AAO did not adopt those criterion findings because it could not tell whether RFE evidence was considered (pp. 1–2). Final merits not reached.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | unclear — source PDF |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | unclear — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | unclear — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | unclear — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Membership, judging, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role: unclear in AAO disposition. Director was said to have found judging and scholarly articles met and membership/leading role unmet, but AAO did not adopt those criterion findings because it could not tell whether RFE evidence was considered (pp. 1–2). Final merits not reached.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Do not report the Director’s criterion findings as affirmed; AAO expressly leaves outcome open.
Editorial use note: May support carefully scoped, source-cited procedural or evidentiary guidance; clearly label as nonprecedent and preserve procedural posture.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.