AAO research
EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision MAR192010_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR192010_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. No criterion merits review; motion untimely and failed filing requirements (pp. 2–3).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR192010_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 19, 2010 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability; field not specified. |
Procedural posture | AAO dismissed the appeal on June 12, 2009. Petitioner filed a motion with AAO July 13, 2009, rather than the office maintaining the record; AAO returned it July 14 for correct filing. Nebraska Service Center received it July 20, 38 days after the appeal decision was served by mail. AAO found it untimely and also missing the required statement about judicial proceedings. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reconsider dismissed. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
No criterion merits review; motion untimely and failed filing requirements (pp. 2–3).
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
No criterion merits review; motion untimely and failed filing requirements (pp. 2–3).
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Keep distinct from late appeals and from motion decisions addressing substantive new facts.
Editorial use note: Eligible for carefully scoped, citation-rich procedural content only; preserve nonprecedent status and posture.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Cover/instructions page dated March 19, 2010; EB-1A petition.
PDF page 3 — Finds motion untimely and missing judicial-proceeding statement; dismisses.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Untimely research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.