AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR172022_01B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision MAR172022_01B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision MAR172022_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR172022_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR172022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2022-03-17

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: Motion to reopen and motion to reconsider following dismissal of an EB-1A appeal; both motions dismissed.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: Motion to reopen and motion to reconsider following dismissal of an EB-1A appeal; both motions dismissed.; director_findings: As distinguished in source-specific disposition and basis.

Operative disposition

{'outcome': 'Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed.', 'basis': 'The AAO found the motion did not establish new facts warranting reopening or demonstrate that the prior decision misapplied law or policy. The underlying decision had found published-material and judging evidence at the criterion stage, but concluded the record did not establish sustained acclaim in final merits.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]}

Final-merits status

The AAO found the motion did not establish new facts warranting reopening or demonstrate that the prior decision misapplied law or policy. The underlying decision had found published-material and judging evidence at the criterion stage, but concluded the record did not establish sustained acclaim in final merits.

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow comparison for actor/performer final-merits treatment and distinction between meeting individual criteria and showing sustained acclaim.', 'caveats': 'This is a motion decision reviewing a prior record, not a fresh appeal. Cite the prior decision’s posture accurately; do not treat motion dismissal as a separate initial-criteria finding.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR172022_01B2203