AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision MAR162011_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR162011_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR162011_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2011-03-16 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal dismissed. The appeal form left the error statement blank and offered no supporting evidence or argument identifying an error.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: Summary dismissal; no specific error identified; director_findings: The Director denied the petition, finding no sustained national or international acclaim. The Form I-290B checked “No Supplemental brief and/or additional evidence will be submitted.” The petitioner left the section explaining appeal errors blank and submitted no exhibits apart from the denial notice. AAO summarily dismissed because no specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact was identified. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The appeal form left the error statement blank and offered no supporting evidence or argument identifying an error.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'summary_dismissal_failure_to_identify_error', 'aggregation_valid': True, 'use': 'Procedural cluster for appeals with blank/no specific-error statements; avoid deriving facts about the scientific work.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not characterize a procedural rejection, dismissal, or remand as a completed merits adjudication.', 'Do not infer individual criterion findings from the Director’s aggregate threshold statements.', 'Do not treat remand as approval.', 'Do not treat a nonprecedent decision as binding authority.'], 'caveat': 'No individual criterion or final-merits outcome by AAO.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.