AAO research
EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision MAR142008_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR142008_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Fashion-show participation did not establish prestigious/exclusive showcases or field-wide acclaim; contractual work for brands did not establish a leading/critical role; published material, associations and contributions evidence was insufficient. (pp. 3–8).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR142008_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 14, 2008 |
Classification / field stated in source | Fashion design; fashion designer / technical designer |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial; dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Legacy decision assesses the record as a whole and finds no sustained acclaim/top-of-field showing; no separate modern final-merits section. (p. 8) |
What the AAO decision addressed
Fashion-show participation did not establish prestigious/exclusive showcases or field-wide acclaim; contractual work for brands did not establish a leading/critical role; published material, associations and contributions evidence was insufficient. (pp. 3–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
(p. 3)
(p. 4)
(pp. 4–5)
(pp. 6–7)
(p. 7)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Useful fashion comparator on routine fashion-show participation, client work vs organizational role, and independent proof of venue/reputation. Individual legacy decision page; explain fashion-show evidence was not treated as exclusive showcase.
Editorial use note: Individual legacy decision page; explain fashion-show evidence was not treated as exclusive showcase.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.