AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR072022_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision MAR072022_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision MAR072022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR072022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). FA youth-coaching certificates were training credentials rather than a major internationally recognized one-time award; association membership, judging, and other claimed criteria were not supported by evidence of qualifying achievement/actual judging. Two additional criteria were expressly reserved once the initial three-criterion threshold failed. New documents were not considered because deficiencies had already been noticed (pp. 2–6).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR072022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 7, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A athletics appeal; petitioner is a soccer athlete and youth soccer coach.

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; petitioner raised extraordinary-ability and alternative E21 theories; AAO dismissed (pp. 1–6).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 6).

Final-merits status

No separate Kazarian final-merits step; the initial threshold was not met and the aggregate assessment was adverse (p. 6).

What the AAO decision addressed

FA youth-coaching certificates were training credentials rather than a major internationally recognized one-time award; association membership, judging, and other claimed criteria were not supported by evidence of qualifying achievement/actual judging. Two additional criteria were expressly reserved once the initial three-criterion threshold failed. New documents were not considered because deficiencies had already been noticed (pp. 2–6).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached
AAO expressly reserved this additional criterion because fewer than three criteria were established (p. 6).

Membership

not met
FAN/certification evidence did not establish association membership based on outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts (p. 5). — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Coaching qualifications and letters did not prove actual participation as a judge of others’ work (p. 5). — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not reached
AAO expressly reserved this additional criterion because fewer than three criteria were established (p. 6).

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Citations refer to physical PDF pages; every physical page visually inspected in page order.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Specific athlete/coach example distinguishing coaching credentials from an internationally recognized award and a professional association membership criterion. Potential case page focused on credential-versus-award distinction; clarify unresolved/reserved categories. No CMS edits or publication were made.

Editorial use note: Potential case page focused on credential-versus-award distinction; clarify unresolved/reserved categories. No CMS edits or publication were made.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR072022_01B2203