AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision MAR072019_01B2203: Motion to reopen denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR072019_01B2203: Motion to reopen denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR072019_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2019-03-07 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Motion to reopen prior appeal decision denying petition; petitioner relied on online material and rankings as new evidence for published-material criterion.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal/motion as described in source; director_findings: Motion to reopen prior appeal decision denying petition; petitioner relied on online material and rankings as new evidence for published-material criterion. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Motion to reopen denied.', 'basis': 'Online screenshots/rankings lacked required dates, authors, article detail, or proof of qualifying publication; website traffic figures did not establish major-media status. Motion did not establish eligibility. (pp. 2–3)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Prior decision found only two initial criteria and motion did not establish the published-material criterion; no final-merits determination. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Useful narrow source for evidence requirements for online published material and traffic/rank estimates in motion practice.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent, fact-specific decision. Preserve posture and individual evidence; do not aggregate as a generalized rule.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.