AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR052009_02B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision MAR052009_02B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision MAR052009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR052009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Sparse record and legacy decision. Narrow educational fit for distinguishing ads featuring a person from media coverage about the person and for salary comparison evidence.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR052009_02B2203

Decision date as printed

March 5, 2009 (cover stamp partially legible)

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability appeal / AAO decision

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; dismissed. Petitioner did not file the promised appeal brief/additional evidence after more than 18 months.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached_with_aggregate_unfavorable_review

What the AAO decision addressed

Sparse record and legacy decision. Narrow educational fit for distinguishing ads featuring a person from media coverage about the person and for salary comparison evidence.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"No source completeness hold; identifying data redacted."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Published material about petitioner; pages: 4

  • claim: Display at artistic exhibitions/showcases; pages: 5

  • claim: Leading/critical role; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: High salary; pages: 6

  • claim: Final merits; pages: 6

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: limited_historical_context_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR052009_02B2203