AAO research
EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision MAR042009_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR042009_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). The claimed pageant recognition was not shown to relate to community-health mentoring or intended U.S. work. AAO found submitted evidence insufficient under claimed awards, association membership, published-material, judging, and leading/critical-role criteria. (pp. 3–7).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR042009_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 4, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | Community health mentor; petitioner also relied on a Miss Nepal beauty-contest placement, modeling, judging, journalism and volunteer work. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). |
Final-merits status | No separate final-merits step; fewer than three criteria established. Decision also found no sustained acclaim at the top of the claimed field. (p. 7) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The claimed pageant recognition was not shown to relate to community-health mentoring or intended U.S. work. AAO found submitted evidence insufficient under claimed awards, association membership, published-material, judging, and leading/critical-role criteria. (pp. 3–7)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
(p. 2)
(p. 3)
(p. 4)
(p. 5)
(p. 6)
(p. 7)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Useful cautionary comparator on field coherence and evidence that a prior public profile/pageant award transfers to a distinct claimed professional field; avoid collapsing pageant, health, volunteer, and media activities into one specialty. Individual page with explicit field-of-endeavor and chronology caveats.
Editorial use note: Individual page with explicit field-of-endeavor and chronology caveats.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Leading or critical role research
Other Named Professions sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.