AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision MAR032023_01B2203: remanded. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Remanded The AAO Remanded for the Director to reassess the evidence and issue a new decision with a final-merits analysis if warranted; it did not decide ultimate eligibility.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from the assigned source PDF; no CMS publication.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR032023_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2023-03-03 |
Classification / field stated in source | Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related motion decision |
Procedural posture | Appeal from denial of EB-1A petition; AAO withdrew the Director’s decision and Remanded for a new decision. |
Operative disposition | Remanded |
Final-merits status | unresolved; remand directs a new final-merits decision if three criteria are found. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO Remanded for the Director to reassess the evidence and issue a new decision with a final-merits analysis if warranted; it did not decide ultimate eligibility.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The AAO Remanded for the Director to reassess the evidence and issue a new decision with a final-merits analysis if warranted; it did not decide ultimate eligibility.; pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6
claim: Procedural classification, field and decision date verified from the caption and opening page.; pages: 1
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: caveats: Source contains an apparent internal mismatch: introductory criterion summary on p. 2 is not fully consistent with the later criterion-by-criterion discussion and remand instructions. This review follows the specific analyses and expressly records the role criterion as not met and ultimate eligibility as unresolved.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Possible researcher comparison on separating scholarly authorship, original contributions and organizational role evidence; keep remand unresolved.; recommended_use: Source-cited case page or narrowly scoped aggregation that preserves field, date, procedural posture, exact criterion states, and whether final merits was reached.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.