AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR012024_01B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision MAR012024_01B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision MAR012024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR012024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO agreed two criteria were supported but found the original-contributions criterion was not met: citations/rankings and evidence of others’ work using the petitioner’s findings did not establish that his contributions had already attained major significance in the field. The three-criterion threshold was not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR012024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 1, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: materials science / engineering research.

Procedural posture

Appeal from Texas Service Center denial; Director found two of three claimed criteria met (judging and authorship), but original contributions not met.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

"not reached as a full final-merits stage; eligibility failed at criteria threshold, with an additional top-of-field observation."

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO agreed two criteria were supported but found the original-contributions criterion was not met: citations/rankings and evidence of others’ work using the petitioner’s findings did not establish that his contributions had already attained major significance in the field. The three-criterion threshold was not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met
Director found judging criterion met; no dispute in AAO analysis. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Citation totals/rankings and use of findings did not show realized major significance to the field; contributions must be original and already consequential. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

met
Director found scholarly authorship criterion met. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • pp. 1–4; criterion posture and standard p. 2, evidence analysis p. 3, conclusion/order p. 4.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Current comparator for research impact: citation counts/journal prestige alone do not establish major significance; tie evidence to realized field impact and source records. eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Editorial use note: eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Computing sector research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Major Significance research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR012024_01B2203