AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR012019_01B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR012019_01B2203: dismissed. AAO withdrew the Director’s positive membership finding, found awards, membership, and published material not met, and affirmed that critical role was met. Original contributions were not established; threshold remained unmet, so no formal final-merits determination.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A petition appeal or motion. The 2015 motion is in scope for procedural analysis, not as a new merits decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR012019_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 1, 2019 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition/appeal |
Procedural posture | EB-1A appeal; appeal dismissed after fewer than three criteria; no formal final-merits determination. |
Operative disposition | dismissed |
Final-merits status | Fewer than three criteria were satisfied; AAO stated a formal final-merits determination was unnecessary, though it made aggregate observations. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO withdrew the Director’s positive membership finding, found awards, membership, and published material not met, and affirmed that critical role was met. Original contributions were not established; threshold remained unmet, so no formal final-merits determination.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — p. 6 |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | met — p. 6 |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The beneficiary was a professional table-tennis player and trainer; the Director found membership and critical role met, while the petitioner claimed additional awards, membership, published material, and contributions.; pages: 1; 2
claim: Competition certificates/standings did not establish nationally/internationally recognized awards; the evidence also contained an unresolved competition-date discrepancy.; pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: “First Class Athlete” membership did not establish outstanding achievements adjudicated by recognized experts; AAO withdrew the Director’s positive membership finding.; pages: 4; 5
claim: Two articles did not establish qualifying published material/major-media status; circulation/readership evidence was insufficient.; pages: 5; 6
claim: Letters about playing/training did not show methods widely used, techniques adopted, or other field-wide major contributions; the Director’s critical-role finding was supported.; pages: 6
claim: The appeal was dismissed because fewer than three criteria were met; formal final merits was not provided.; pages: 7
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Caption/date/classification/field/posture visually checked.
PDF page 7 — Final source page visually checked; operative order and outcome are pinpointed above.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Original contributions of major significance research
Leading or critical role research
Athletics sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.