AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision MAR012016_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR012016_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). AAO found only two of the required three evidentiary criteria satisfied. It did not conduct the modern separate final-merits step; it stated that aggregate evidence also did not establish the required level of expertise. (pp. 7–8).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR012016_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 1, 2016 |
Classification / field stated in source | Music composition; petitioner was a composer seeking to continue work in that field. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of denial of an EB-1A petition; AAO dismissed the appeal. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). |
Final-merits status | Separate final-merits determination not reached because only two criteria were satisfied; AAO nevertheless said aggregate evidence did not establish the required expertise. (pp. 7–8) |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found only two of the required three evidentiary criteria satisfied. It did not conduct the modern separate final-merits step; it stated that aggregate evidence also did not establish the required level of expertise. (pp. 7–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
(p. 3)
(pp. 2–3)
(pp. 3–4)
(pp. 4–5)
(pp. 5–6)
(pp. 6–7)
(pp. 7–8)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Useful music-composition comparator on artistic display versus the awards, media, contribution, and scholarly-article criteria; preserve the distinction between a film and a scholarly article. Individual case page with anonymization retained; source is complete and suitable for a cited case summary.
Editorial use note: Individual case page with anonymization retained; source is complete and suitable for a cited case summary.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.