AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR012006_06B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR012006_06B2203: Appeal dismissed. The AAO found the submitted awards, published-material, contribution, display, and role evidence insufficient to establish sustained acclaim and eligibility. (pp. 4–10).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR012006_06B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 1, 2006 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO EB-1A arts case concerning a graphic artist/printmaker. (pp. 2–3) |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 2, 11) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | The AAO discussed the evidence in aggregate and found it did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status. (pp. 9–10) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found the submitted awards, published-material, contribution, display, and role evidence insufficient to establish sustained acclaim and eligibility. (pp. 4–10)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No source identity or completeness hold. Some source text is degraded/old scan; image-reviewed evidence controls where extraction is uncertain.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If editorially cleared, prepare a source-linked decision summary that names the procedural posture, distinguishes criterion-stage findings from final merits, and cites the PDF pages. Narrow historical visual-arts comparison on display evidence versus acclaim, exhibition notices, gallery role, and the distinction between activity and recognition.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.