AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN302022_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUN302022_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN302022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN302022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO found awards, memberships, and judging not established; no three criteria were met and appeal dismissed after aggregate acclaim review.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A decision; any case-specific field-of-endeavor limitation is captured in the verified facts and caveats.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN302022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

June 30, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Fewer than three initial criteria were met; AAO said no final-merits determination was required, while separately noting aggregate review did not support acclaim.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found awards, memberships, and judging not established; no three criteria were met and appeal dismissed after aggregate acclaim review.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Membership

Not met — p. 4, p. 5, p. 6

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — p. 7

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petitioner specialized in painting and claimed awards, membership, judging, and commercial success.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Award certificates did not establish national/international recognition, venue prestige, or award significance; membership claims lacked documented membership and association rules.; pages: 3; 4; 5; 6

  • claim: Judging certificates showed invitations but did not objectively establish accepted participation or the judging work performed.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: Appeal also asserted income from artwork; bank credits lacked corroborating sales documentation and comparative remuneration evidence.; pages: 7

  • claim: AAO found no one-time award or three criteria; although formal final-merits determination was unnecessary, it reviewed the record in aggregate and found acclaim unsupported.; pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN302022_01B2203