AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN292009_04B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision JUN292009_04B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUN292009_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN292009_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. The Director had found one criterion; the AAO sustained artistic showcase participation only. Awards, media, judging, contributions and leading role were not established. (pp. 3–8).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN292009_04B2203

Decision date as printed

June 29, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

Arts/music; Nepali singer and guitarist, associated with the band The Angels

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO appellate review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No separate final-merits determination because fewer than three criteria were established. The AAO also observed that acclaim in Nepal had not been sustained during the petitioner’s preceding three years in the United States. (p. 8)

What the AAO decision addressed

The Director had found one criterion; the AAO sustained artistic showcase participation only. Awards, media, judging, contributions and leading role were not established. (pp. 3–8)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Most judging involved local/student competitions; one cited article was from 2000, over six years before filing and therefore insufficient to show sustained acclaim. (p. 6) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
The record did not distinguish the petitioner’s role in a multi-musician concert or document distinguished reputations of concert/charity organizations. (pp. 7–8) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

The decision treats media outlet reach and national recognition as unverified on this record; avoid presenting publication circulation or award prestige as independently confirmed. (pp. 4–6)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: A source-cited musician page can separate event participation from awards and major-media coverage, and explain why album contracts need field salary comparisons.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN292009_04B2203