AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282024_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282024_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN282024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO found lesser awards met, but membership, judging, and artistic display were not established; leading/critical role was reserved after threshold failure. AAO expressly declined formal final merits, while making aggregate no-acclaim observations.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A petition appeal and contains decision-specific procedural/evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN282024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

June 28, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal

Procedural posture

EB-1A appeal; dismissed after fewer than three criteria; formal final-merits determination not reached.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The initial threshold failed; AAO expressly said it need not provide formal final merits, though it made aggregate no-acclaim observations.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found lesser awards met, but membership, judging, and artistic display were not established; leading/critical role was reserved after threshold failure. AAO expressly declined formal final merits, while making aggregate no-acclaim observations.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — p. 2, p. 3

Membership

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not met — p. 4, p. 5, p. 6

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 6

Leading or critical role

Not reached — p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner competed in numerous national and international jiu-jitsu competitions.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: The AAO found IBJJF competition awards, including first-place gold in a 2016 IBJJF event, sufficient for the lesser-awards criterion.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: IBJJF black-belt membership requirements shown in the record focused on affiliation, CPR/first aid, referee training, and academy practice/teaching rather than expert-judged outstanding achievement.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: The referee evidence lacked a duties description or rules showing the petitioner judged competitors’ skills or selected winners; belt promotions were considered instructor duties rather than judging the work of others.; pages: 4; 5; 6

  • claim: The petitioner documented competition appearances but not artistic exhibitions/showcases apart from sports competitions; the additional role criterion was reserved.; pages: 6

  • claim: The threshold failed; AAO dismissed and expressly did not make formal final merits, although it noted the record did not establish sustained acclaim/top-of-field status.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN282024_01B2203