AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282017_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282017_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN282017_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found the petitioner met awards and published-material criteria, but not enough additional criteria to reach three; membership, original contributions, artistic display, and leading/critical role were not established.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A decision; field-specific caveats are stated in verified facts and comparison caveats.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN282017_02B2203

Decision date as printed

June 28, 2017

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The AAO expressly states the initial three-criteria threshold was not met and a full final-merits determination was unnecessary; aggregate review did not support eligibility.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found the petitioner met awards and published-material criteria, but not enough additional criteria to reach three; membership, original contributions, artistic display, and leading/critical role were not established.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — p. 3

Membership

Not met — p. 3

Published material about the person

met — p. 4

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 4, p. 5, p. 6, p. 7

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 7, p. 8

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 8, p. 9

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner was a competitive swimmer and coach; on appeal he claimed six criteria.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Swimming championships supported the awards criterion; the record did not establish restrictive association membership.; pages: 3

  • claim: One article was about the petitioner, but other articles concerned meets rather than him; the AAO found the published-material criterion met.; pages: 4

  • claim: Coaching and swimming achievements lacked proof of field-wide major significance; routine event display and team positions did not establish artistic display or qualifying leadership for a distinguished organization.; pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9

  • claim: The appeal was dismissed because fewer than three criteria were established.; pages: 9

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN282017_02B2203