AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282017_01B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision JUN282017_01B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUN282017_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO expressly labels and conducts a final-merits analysis and finds the totality insufficient, even though it also finds original contributions not met.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO EB-1A extraordinary-ability appeal decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN282017_01B2203

Decision date as printed

June 28, 2017

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140)

Procedural posture

Nonprecedent AAO appeal from EB-1A denial; AAO expressly conducts final-merits analysis.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

AAO expressly labels and conducts a final-merits analysis and finds the totality insufficient, even though it also finds original contributions not met.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO expressly labels and conducts a final-merits analysis and finds the totality insufficient, even though it also finds original contributions not met.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 2, p. 7

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 2

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 8

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Decision identity; Director had found three criteria and denied at final merits.; evidence_pages: 1

  • claim: AAO agrees judging and scholarly authorship are met; disputes original contributions.; evidence_pages: 2

  • claim: Express section B final-merits analysis begins.; evidence_pages: 3

  • claim: Final-merits review of original-contribution evidence.; evidence_pages: 4

  • claim: AAO evaluates recognition and letters.; evidence_pages: 5

  • claim: Evidence of original contributions and recognition examined.; evidence_pages: 6

  • claim: Original-contributions criterion is not met; AAO continues totality analysis.; evidence_pages: 7

  • claim: Further final-merits discussion of contributions and field response.; evidence_pages: 8

  • claim: Analysis continues on publications/citations and totality.; evidence_pages: 8

  • claim: AAO concludes final merits unfavorable and dismisses appeal.; evidence_pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Medicine sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN282017_01B2203