AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN262009_04B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUN262009_04B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN262009_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN262009_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. Awards, published material, contributions, artistic display and leading role were not established; O-1 approval did not control immigrant classification. (pp. 2–9).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN262009_04B2203

Decision date as printed

June 26, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; pianist

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; petitioner cited earlier O-1 approval.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No formal final-merits determination; threshold criteria not established. (pp. 8–9)

What the AAO decision addressed

Awards, published material, contributions, artistic display and leading role were not established; O-1 approval did not control immigrant classification. (pp. 2–9)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Certificates/contest evidence did not establish qualifying recognized awards. (pp. 4–5) — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Evidence did not establish qualifying media about petitioner. (pp. 5–6) — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Letters did not establish original contributions of major significance. (pp. 6–7) — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Performance work did not establish a qualifying critical role for distinguished organizations. (pp. 8–9) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

Do not state O-1 approval controls the immigrant petition; AAO explicitly rejects that inference. (pp. 2–3)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Cited answer for performers on why live performances and prior O-1 approval do not automatically satisfy EB-1A criteria.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN262009_04B2203