AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN262009_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUN262009_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN262009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (physical p. 7). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN262009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (physical p. 7). Only commercial success in performing arts was treated as met, assuming the claimed 2002 album sales of “up to” 250,000 and radio play; the publisher letter lacked corroboration. Awards were appreciation certificates, membership lacked admission rules, media evidence lacked major-media/audience proof or complete translations, and performing at events did not establish a leading/critical role for distinguished organizations (physical pp. 3–7).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_appeal_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN262009_02B2203

Decision date as printed

June 26, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A; singer and recording artist in the performing arts.

Procedural posture

AAO appeal from Texas Service Center denial.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (physical p. 7).

Final-merits status

Final aggregate merits review performed; AAO concludes the evidence does not place the singer/recording artist at the top of the field or show sustained acclaim (physical p. 7).

What the AAO decision addressed

Only commercial success in performing arts was treated as met, assuming the claimed 2002 album sales of “up to” 250,000 and radio play; the publisher letter lacked corroboration. Awards were appreciation certificates, membership lacked admission rules, media evidence lacked major-media/audience proof or complete translations, and performing at events did not establish a leading/critical role for distinguished organizations (physical pp. 3–7).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Certificates recognized participation in anti-drug campaign, television series, and cultural event rather than nationally/internationally recognized excellence awards (physical pp. 3–4). — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Magazine translations lacked required completeness/title/date/author and circulation evidence; Mandalay Gazette’s stated circulation/audience was not major media; BBC/VOA audience reach was not established (physical pp. 4–5). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Benefit performances and radio play did not show a leading/critical role for a distinguished organization or event (physical p. 6). — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

met
The AAO assumes in the petitioner’s favor the claim of up to 250,000 sales and notes radio play; still fewer than three criteria are met (physical p. 6). — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Citations use physical PDF page numbers; printed page number noted in page-by-page record where legible.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Potential comparison within performing-arts commercial success and media-reach cases; keep singer/recording artist and cultural-event context explicit. Do not generalize the assumed sales figure as an independently verified fact. Publish with caveat that commercial-success criterion was assumed in petitioner’s favor based on the record, not independently audited sales.

Editorial use note: Publish with caveat that commercial-success criterion was assumed in petitioner’s favor based on the record, not independently audited sales.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Corroborat research

  • Translat research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN262009_02B2203