AAO research
EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision JUN242005_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN242005_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. The petitioner did not meet three criteria: award, membership, published material, major contributions, authorship, display, leading/critical role, and high salary claims were found insufficient. (pp. 3–8).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN242005_04B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 24, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | Sciences/engineering; mechanical-engineering researcher, instructor, and textbook author |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO appellate review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | No distinct Kazarian final-merits stage; the conclusion states the record did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field status. (p. 8) |
What the AAO decision addressed
Appeal dismissed. The petitioner did not meet three criteria: award, membership, published material, major contributions, authorship, display, leading/critical role, and high salary claims were found insufficient. (pp. 3–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Create a source-led answer page on evidence of textbook impact and how to compare engineering compensation, keeping filing-date, source, and occupation comparability limits explicit.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Leading or critical role research
Computing sector research
Medicine sector research
Performance sector research
Teaching sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.