AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision JUN232010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed summarily. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN232010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed summarily. No criterion review; the issue was failure to submit initial evidence under e-filing instructions and lack of a specific appeal basis (pp. 2–3).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN232010_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 23, 2010 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability; field not specified in the reviewed opinion. |
Procedural posture | Petitioner electronically filed Form I-140 Feb. 17, 2009; filing instructions required initial evidence within seven business days. Director denied May 4, 2009 because that evidence was not filed in time. On appeal counsel did not dispute the omission, requested additional time for a brief/evidence, and later sought more time to collect Kenyan records; AAO received nothing further for about 12 months. AAO summarily dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed summarily. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
No criterion review; the issue was failure to submit initial evidence under e-filing instructions and lack of a specific appeal basis (pp. 2–3).
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
No criterion review; the issue was failure to submit initial evidence under e-filing instructions and lack of a specific appeal basis (pp. 2–3).
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Do not infer criteria outcomes; initial evidence was missing at threshold.
Editorial use note: May support carefully scoped, source-cited procedural or evidentiary guidance; clearly label as nonprecedent and preserve procedural posture.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Cover/instructions dated June 23, 2010; EB-1A petition.
PDF page 3 — Concludes no specific appeal basis; order summarily dismisses.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.