AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN202013_02B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision JUN202013_02B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision JUN202013_02B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; prior AAO decision affirmed; petition remains denied. Review source…

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN202013_02B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; prior AAO decision affirmed; petition remains denied. The filing repeats prior materials and does not identify an error in the latest decision or establish new, previously unavailable facts. Prior decision found only one criterion (artistic display) met and rejected membership, published material, original contributions, high salary, and commercial success; current order does not reopen merits.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN202013_02B2203

Decision date as printed

June 20, 2013

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: artist/graphic artist; field as framed in underlying EB-1A case.

Procedural posture

Third motion to reopen after prior appeal and two prior motions; AAO considers only whether its latest prior decision was erroneous or new facts warrant reopening.

Operative disposition

Motion to reopen dismissed; prior AAO decision affirmed; petition remains denied.

Final-merits status

Not reached in this motion; prior denial for failure to meet three criteria remains in effect.

What the AAO decision addressed

The filing repeats prior materials and does not identify an error in the latest decision or establish new, previously unavailable facts. Prior decision found only one criterion (artistic display) met and rejected membership, published material, original contributions, high salary, and commercial success; current order does not reopen merits.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

not considered

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not considered

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

not considered

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source holds and limits

"The current motion order does not re-adjudicate criterion states; prior decision context is summarized in outcome basis only."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • PDF p. 1: Cover identifies June 20, 2013, Texas Service Center, EB-1A petition, self-represented third motion.

  • PDF p. 2: Motion and prior-proceeding framework; previous AAO decision and criteria findings summarized.

  • PDF p. 3: Procedural history of earlier motions; current evidence listed (magazine, exhibition announcement, foreign newspaper information and article) and found not new/previously unavailable.

  • PDF p. 4: No new facts or error; motion dismissed; prior AAO decision affirmed and petition remains denied.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Procedural motion comparison only; not a fresh merits comparator. Useful for distinction between evidence and “new” evidence on motions.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN202013_02B2203