AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN202012_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO rejects awards, membership, judging, original contributions, authorship, leading/critical role and high-salary evidence. It also finds the aggregate record does not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical source is an AAO decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN202012_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 20, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from a service-center denial; appeal dismissed following final-merits discussion. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO discusses the totality of the evidence and concludes that it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field recognition. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO rejects awards, membership, judging, original contributions, authorship, leading/critical role and high-salary evidence. It also finds the aggregate record does not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 9 |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 10 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — p. 13 |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner seeks classification based on work involving grain-processing machinery and related engineering.; evidence_pages: 1; 2; 10; 11
claim: The AAO reviews awards, membership, judging, original contributions, scholarly authorship, leading role, and salary evidence and finds the criteria unestablished.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13
claim: The decision concludes that the totality does not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing and dismisses the appeal.; evidence_pages: 13; 14
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.