AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN182019_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision JUN182019_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision JUN182019_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN182019_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO withdrew the Director’s favorable leading/critical-role finding and found fewer than three criteria. The decision states it need not provide a formal final-merits analysis. (pp. 2–9).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN182019_01B2203

Decision date as printed

June 18, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; culinary chef and gastronomic consultant

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial and subsequent motion decision; AAO de novo review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No formal final-merits determination because fewer than three criteria were established. AAO’s conclusion included an adverse aggregate-acclaim assessment. (pp. 8–9)

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal dismissed. AAO withdrew the Director’s favorable leading/critical-role finding and found fewer than three criteria. The decision states it need not provide a formal final-merits analysis. (pp. 2–9)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association evidence did not show selective admission based on outstanding achievement. (pp. 4–5) — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
An article about a competition did not establish that the petitioner participated as a judge of others’ work. (p. 5) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
AAO withdrew the Director’s favorable finding; evidence did not establish a qualifying role or the distinguished reputation of the organizations. (pp. 7–9) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Source-cited explainer can distinguish a cookbook from scholarly authorship and a prominent title from documented organizational impact.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Performance sector research

  • Other Named Professions sector research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN182019_01B2203