AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision JUN182012_03B2203: Appeal rejected as improperly filed because updated Form G-28 was not supplied. Review source…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN182012_03B2203: Appeal rejected as improperly filed because updated Form G-28 was not supplied. For appeals filed on/after March 4, 2010, counsel had to submit a new Form G-28. AAO requested updated G-28 May 3, 2012 with ten calendar days to respond; more than a month later it had not arrived.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN182012_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 18, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | Not specified |
Procedural posture | Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; counsel appealed and submitted brief/evidence. |
Operative disposition | Appeal rejected as improperly filed because updated Form G-28 was not supplied. |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
For appeals filed on/after March 4, 2010, counsel had to submit a new Form G-28. AAO requested updated G-28 May 3, 2012 with ten calendar days to respond; more than a month later it had not arrived.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | Not reached |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached |
Source holds and limits
status:
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
No EB-1A merits determination.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover date June 18, 2012; Texas Service Center; EB-1A Form I-140.; pages: 1
claim: Director denied petition July 28, 2010; appeal filed August 9, 2010.; pages: 2
claim: AAO said new G-28 required for appeal filed after March 4, 2010; requested updated form May 3, 2012; none arrived more than a month later.; pages: 2
claim: Appeal rejected as improperly filed for missing updated G-28.; pages: 2
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.