AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision JUN182008_03B2203: Indeterminable from provided PDF; operative order and rest of decision missing. Review source…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN182008_03B2203: Indeterminable from provided PDF; operative order and rest of decision missing. Available source truncates during first criterion and has blank physical pages 4-11; cannot determine full AAO analysis, disposition, or completeness of the actual decision.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A in scope but unusable pending complete source.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN182008_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 18, 2008 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A appeal, but source PDF materially incomplete |
Procedural posture | Available first three pages describe denial after RFE for missing evidence, notice of appeal, director’s sustained-acclaim finding, and one criterion discussion begins (lesser awards); the document then contains eight visually blank physical pages. |
Operative disposition | Indeterminable from provided PDF; operative order and rest of decision missing. |
Final-merits status | Not determinable: incomplete source ends during first criterion and contains no operative order. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Available source truncates during first criterion and has blank physical pages 4-11; cannot determine full AAO analysis, disposition, or completeness of the actual decision.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
true
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover page identifies June 18, 2008 EB-1A petition and file LIN 07 048 52046.; pages: 1
claim: Page 2 says director denied after RFE and motion; appeal was pending. Petitioner seeks extraordinary ability in business as management consultant; director found acclaim lacking and petitioner did not submit evidence identified as missing.; pages: 2
claim: Page 3 begins lesser-awards criterion discussion, but physical pages 4-11 are blank; no order or final disposition is available.; pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Hold; no publication or aggregation until complete decision is obtained.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.