AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN142005_09B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision JUN142005_09B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision JUN142005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed as moot. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUN142005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed as moot. Adjustment to lawful permanent residence based on a later, lesser-classification petition; no AAO merits determination.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN142005_09B2203

Decision date as printed

June 14, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A immigrant petition in the sciences, INA §203(b)(1)(A)

Procedural posture

Appeal dismissed as moot after later lesser-classification I-140 and I-485 approvals

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Adjustment to lawful permanent residence based on a later, lesser-classification petition; no AAO merits determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
AAO dismissed as moot without individual criterion adjudication; Director’s summarized conclusion is not criterion-specific. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

["Do not describe the EB-1A petition as approved; the later petition was under a lesser classification.", "No criterion-by-criterion findings are present."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Do not describe the EB-1A petition as approved; the later petition was under a lesser classification.

  • No criterion-by-criterion findings are present.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: First page identifies EAC 03 024 51125 and an EB-1A petition; date June 14, 2005.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director denied petition and the source gives only a general finding that sustained acclaim was not established.; pages: 2

  • claim: After filing the instant petition, petitioner filed another I-140 under a lesser classification; it was approved January 18, 2005.; pages: 2

  • claim: Concurrent I-485 was approved January 26, 2005; AAO dismissed this appeal as moot based on LPR status.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'fit': 'narrow procedural example', 'reason': 'Can support a procedural explainer on mootness after adjustment through another employment category; no substantive criterion comparison.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN142005_09B2203