AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision JUN132005_30B2203: remanded. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Remanded AAO directs the Director to address concerns stated in the RFE and allow response, then issue a new decision; it does not finally decide eligibility.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision that remands without finally deciding eligibility.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN132005_30B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2005-06-13 |
Classification / field stated in source | business professor and research faculty member; EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition |
Procedural posture | Appeal from EB-1A denial; AAO withdraws the Director decision and remands for a new decision after identifying unresolved notice and response concerns. |
Operative disposition | Remanded |
Final-merits status | AAO directs the Director to address concerns stated in the RFE and allow response, then issue a new decision; it does not finally decide eligibility. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO directs the Director to address concerns stated in the RFE and allow response, then issue a new decision; it does not finally decide eligibility.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | unclear — p. 3 |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | unclear — p. 5 |
Scholarly authorship | unclear — p. 5 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — p. 5 |
Leading or critical role | unclear — p. 6 |
High salary or remuneration | unclear — p. 6 |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — p. 6 |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The decision concerns an EB-1A petition for a business-management academic; Director denied the petition.; pages: 1; 2
claim: AAO discusses multiple criterion-evidence issues but identifies unresolved RFE concerns about proposed U.S. work/benefits and directs a new decision after an opportunity to respond.; pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7
claim: AAO withdraws the Director decision and remands; no final approval/denial or final-merits ruling is issued in this decision.; pages: 7
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion_with_posture_caveat
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Medicine sector research
Teaching sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.