AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision JUN112007_02B2203: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. Review source status…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN112007_02B2203: The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN112007_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2007-07-11 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: The discussion states petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn on May 25, 2007; the order says dismissal based on withdrawal by petitioner.; citation_pages: 1; classification: withdrawal; director_findings: The Director denied the petition; no denial rationale is provided on this page. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'The appeal is dismissed based on its withdrawal by the petitioner.', 'basis': 'The discussion states petitioner, through counsel, requested that the appeal be withdrawn on May 25, 2007; the order says dismissal based on withdrawal by petitioner.', 'citation_pages': [1]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'withdrawal', 'use': 'Narrow procedural example of an appeal dismissed after a withdrawal request.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not label this disposition as an AAO merits denial or merits approval.', 'Do not infer any criterion-level finding or final-merits outcome unless the decision explicitly states it.', 'Do not treat this non-precedent individual decision as binding authority.'], 'caveat': 'No EB-1A criterion analysis or final-merits review appears.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Withdrawal research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.