AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision JUN102013_01B2203: Both motions dismissed; Oct. 19, 2012 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. Review source…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN102013_01B2203: Both motions dismissed; Oct. 19, 2012 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. Motion lacked required statement; reconsideration did not identify error in latest AAO ruling; reopening evidence was previously submitted/obtainable and did not address procedural basis of latest decision.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural motion.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN102013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 10, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | Combined motions to reopen/reconsider; dismissed |
Procedural posture | Director denied Sep. 6, 2011; AAO dismissed appeal Oct. 19, 2012. Petitioner repeated an appeal brief, omitted required judicial-proceedings statement, and submitted no new evidence addressing latest AAO decision. |
Operative disposition | Both motions dismissed; Oct. 19, 2012 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. |
Final-merits status | Not coded in the normalized review fields |
What the AAO decision addressed
Motion lacked required statement; reconsideration did not identify error in latest AAO ruling; reopening evidence was previously submitted/obtainable and did not address procedural basis of latest decision.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover dated June 10, 2013 identifies EB-1A petition.; pages: 1
claim: Director denial September 6, 2011 and AAO appeal dismissal October 19, 2012; current combined motions dismissed.; pages: 2
claim: Petitioner failed to include judicial-proceedings statement; repeated earlier arguments and supplied no additional evidence or specific error.; pages: 2
claim: Evidence such as curriculum vitae, letters, photographs, pamphlets was not shown new; motions dismissed and prior decision affirmed.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural-only; exclude from outcome aggregation.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.