AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision JUN102005_07B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish the claimed criteria or sustained acclaim; the appeal was dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO decision involving an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN102005_07B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 10, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of an EB-1A Form I-140; petitioner was in the United States and the decision also addresses prospective work in the field; nonprecedent decision. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The decision concludes the petitioner did not establish eligibility and dismisses; it does not conduct a distinct formal final-merits determination. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner did not establish the claimed criteria or sustained acclaim; the appeal was dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 5 |
Judging the work of others | |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner sought classification as a food scientist and submitted evidence relating to association membership, published material, judging, original contributions and scholarly authorship; the decision states other criteria were not claimed.; evidence_pages: 2; 3
claim: The AAO found the claimed association memberships did not require outstanding achievements, directory entries did not establish the published-material criterion, and evidence did not establish the remaining criteria.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9
claim: The AAO dismissed the appeal after concluding the petitioner had not established eligibility.; evidence_pages: 9
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.