AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision JUN092020_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN092020_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN092020_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2020-06-09 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; appeal dismissed; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; appeal dismissed; director_findings: See decision-specific basis; AAO findings distinguished from Director/SCOPS findings. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'AAO agreed petitioner met the judging criterion, but found the Mara de Oro award evidence did not establish a qualifying nationally or internationally recognized award and the remaining claimed criteria did not establish three criteria.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Appeal dismissed after the initial threshold was not met; final merits not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow music-sector comparison on judging and award recognition; a judging criterion alone did not satisfy the three-criterion threshold.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent, fact-specific decision. Remand is not approval. Exclude procedural/classification cases from substantive merits outcome aggregation. Historical records require legal-temporal context.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.