AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUN072024_01B2203: Leading or critical role

AAO EB-1A decision JUN072024_01B2203: Leading or critical role

EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision JUN072024_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for a new decision including totality/final merits.…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for a new decision including totality/final merits. Director found judging, authorship, and leading/critical role met; awards, membership, original contributions, and high remuneration not met. AAO concluded denial explanation did not address evidence such as company leadership, standing, and letters, and directed a proper totality analysis. No final-merits outcome was decided.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A appeal; initial threshold met; final merits unresolved on remand.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUN072024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

June 7, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal; decision withdrawn and Remanded

Procedural posture

Director found the initial evidentiary threshold met but denied on final merits. AAO found the final-merits discussion did not analyze the totality of evidence or explain why the petitioner did not qualify.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for a new decision including totality/final merits.

Final-merits status

Not decided; Remanded for final-merits analysis.

What the AAO decision addressed

Director found judging, authorship, and leading/critical role met; awards, membership, original contributions, and high remuneration not met. AAO concluded denial explanation did not address evidence such as company leadership, standing, and letters, and directed a proper totality analysis. No final-merits outcome was decided.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met
Director found criterion met. — p. 2

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies June 7, 2024 EB-1A appeal by a business executive specializing in forensic investigations, fraud prevention, and information security.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director found judging, authorship, and leading/critical role met; awards, membership, original contributions, and high salary not met.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO finds final-merits discussion insufficiently addressed seven-criterion evidence, company leadership, and reference letters.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: AAO withdraws decision and remands for a new decision that evaluates totality and sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.; pages: 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for criterion/totality education; cite the director’s criterion findings as such.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUN072024_01B2203