AAO research
EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUN042024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO expressly conducts a final-merits determination after reciting the Director’s three initial criterion findings and finds that the totality does not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO decision concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN042024_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 4, 2024 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from Texas Service Center denial; Director found three initial criteria met but denied at final merits; AAO conducts formal final-merits review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | AAO expressly conducts a final-merits determination after reciting the Director’s three initial criterion findings and finds that the totality does not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO expressly conducts a final-merits determination after reciting the Director’s three initial criterion findings and finds that the totality does not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — p. 2 |
Original contributions of major significance | met — p. 2 |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 2 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner is a postdoctoral associate in physics; decision dated June 4, 2024.; evidence_pages: 1
claim: Director found judging, original contributions, and scholarly authorship criteria satisfied; the central issue is final merits.; evidence_pages: 2
claim: AAO begins formal final-merits analysis and weighs career stage, peer-review claims and evidence.; evidence_pages: 3
claim: Review of peer-review count and judging reputation; conflicting counts are addressed.; evidence_pages: 4
claim: AAO determines actual peer-review experience was 27 manuscripts and questions whether judging service places petitioner at top of field.; evidence_pages: 5
claim: Final-merits discussion of citation history and impact; one highly cited paper insufficient to demonstrate sustained top-of-field acclaim.; evidence_pages: 6
claim: Publication record and letters lack sufficient current corroboration/field recognition.; evidence_pages: 7
claim: Final-merits conclusion unfavorable; appeal dismissed.; evidence_pages: 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.