AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision JUN022005_21B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUN022005_21B2203: Appeal dismissed. None of the claimed criteria was established; the decision found no qualifying evidence of three criteria or sustained acclaim. (pp. 2–8).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN022005_21B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 2, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | Sciences; molecular biologist/research scientist at SAIC Frederick supporting the National Cancer Institute |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial; AAO appellate review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | No separate final-merits determination because the initial criterion threshold was not met; AAO concluded the record did not establish top-of-field standing. (pp. 6–7) |
What the AAO decision addressed
Appeal dismissed. None of the claimed criteria was established; the decision found no qualifying evidence of three criteria or sustained acclaim. (pp. 2–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | not met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Source-cited researcher explainer can distinguish citations from media about a scientist, research funding from awards, and peer review from general reviewer qualifications.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Medicine sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.