AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision JUN012015_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish evidence satisfying at least three criteria; translation and probative-value deficiencies affected the record.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN012015_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 1, 2015 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal of denial of EB-1A Form I-140; nonprecedent decision. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The decision identifies final merits as a later step if the initial threshold were met; the threshold was not met. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner did not establish evidence satisfying at least three criteria; translation and probative-value deficiencies affected the record.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 5 |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner relied on published-material, leading/critical role and commercial-success evidence; foreign-language documents and translations formed a substantial part of the record.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8
claim: The AAO found the translations deficient, published material and leading/critical-role evidence insufficient, and commercial-success evidence insufficient; comparable evidence was not established.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9
claim: The AAO found the initial three-criterion requirement unmet and dismissed the appeal without a formal final-merits determination.; evidence_pages: 9; 10
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Translat research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.