AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUN012009_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO rejects awards, membership, original contributions, scholarly authorship, leading/critical role, and high-salary evidence. It finds the record does not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical source is an AAO decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUN012009_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | June 1, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from a Texas Service Center denial; appeal dismissed following final-merits review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The final conclusion finds petitioner has not established sustained acclaim or recognition among the small percentage at the top of the field. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO rejects awards, membership, original contributions, scholarly authorship, leading/critical role, and high-salary evidence. It finds the record does not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not met — p. 11 |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner is a biomedical researcher and submits laboratory research, publications, awards, and expert letters.; evidence_pages: 1; 2; 3; 6; 7
claim: The AAO rejects the claimed awards, membership, research contributions, authorship, role, and salary evidence.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12
claim: The AAO finds sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing unestablished and dismisses the appeal.; evidence_pages: 12
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.