AAO research
EB-1A motion disposition — AAO decision JUL302012_06B2203: Motions dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL302012_06B2203: Motions dismissed. Evidence submitted with the motions was not new/material or did not establish error in the prior AAO decision; the underlying denial remains in force.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL302012_06B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 30, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | Motions to reopen and reconsider dismissed |
Procedural posture | Combined motions after prior AAO denial in April 2011. Motion argues about later-submitted translations, award/media evidence, and error in prior decision. |
Operative disposition | Motions dismissed |
Final-merits status | Prior denial remains; no fresh final-merits determination in this motion decision. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Evidence submitted with the motions was not new/material or did not establish error in the prior AAO decision; the underlying denial remains in force.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies combined motions and date July 30, 2012; identity is redacted.; pages: 1
claim: AAO summarizes the prior appeal and scope of the motion and discusses requirements for reopening/reconsideration.; pages: 2
claim: AAO finds the translations, award/media evidence, and legal argument do not establish a basis to reopen or reconsider.; pages: 3
claim: AAO dismisses both motions and leaves the prior denial in place.; pages: 4
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: eligible_for_narrow_fact_grounded_content: True; must_preserve_procedural_posture: True; recommended_use: Procedural motion example only: distinguish new evidence from evidence already submitted and explain filing-time limits; not a new merits case.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Translat research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.