AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUL282009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL282009_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The record did not establish the required three initial criteria or sustained acclaim; evidence was undermined by missing/partial translations, authorship and source gaps, and stale evidence. (pp. 6–12).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL282009_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 28, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO EB-1A decision concerning a Brazilian financial journalist/television presenter and producer, including work on the Conta Corrente program. (pp. 2–4) |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 2, 12) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | AAO expressly concluded the record did not establish three criteria or sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing. It did not make a distinct Kazarian final-merits determination. (p. 12) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The record did not establish the required three initial criteria or sustained acclaim; evidence was undermined by missing/partial translations, authorship and source gaps, and stale evidence. (pp. 6–12)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No source identity or completeness hold. Heavy OCR corruption and redactions; verify all quotations against PDF image pages. Do not infer anonymized identity.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If editorially cleared, prepare a source-linked decision summary that names the procedural posture, distinguishes criterion-stage findings from final merits, and cites the PDF pages. Narrow comparison for media/broadcast business cases on awards, published coverage, translations, independent sources, and contemporaneous evidence.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Translat research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.