AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL272007_01B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision JUL272007_01B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision JUL272007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; approval remains revoked. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: AAO decision JUL272007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; approval remains revoked. Petitioner asked for additional time and alleged former counsel withheld the original application, but did not identify specific error in revocation decision or offer evidence addressing regulatory criteria; no supplemental brief/evidence arrived for more than 13 months.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural appeal dismissal; Director’s initial approval was later revoked and current AAO decision did not review criteria merits.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL272007_01B2203

Decision date as printed

July 27, 2007

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A procedural appeal dismissal; Director’s initial approval was later revoked and current AAO decision did not review criteria merits.

Procedural posture

Appeal of revocation of initially approved EB-1A petition; appeal summarily dismissed because petitioner sought more time to reconstruct evidence but did not address revocation grounds or provide evidence.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed; approval remains revoked.

Final-merits status

not reached by current AAO decision

What the AAO decision addressed

Petitioner asked for additional time and alleged former counsel withheld the original application, but did not identify specific error in revocation decision or offer evidence addressing regulatory criteria; no supplemental brief/evidence arrived for more than 13 months.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies EB-1A I-140 at Texas Service Center dated July 27, 2007.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director initially approved petition, later revoked approval May 24, 2006 after notice of intent to revoke; AAO appeal was summarily dismissed.; pages: 2

  • claim: Petitioner asked for more time to reconstruct evidence and alleged counsel did not provide the original application, but submitted no specific argument/evidence challenging revocation.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: AAO dismissed appeal; petitioner had not specifically addressed revocation grounds or provided additional evidence.; pages: 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Narrow procedural explainer on appeals needing specific arguments/evidence and the limits of open-ended extensions; accurately preserve that the petition had been initially approved then revoked.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Revocation research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL272007_01B2203