AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL252016_01B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision JUL252016_01B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUL252016_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Judging and scholarly authorship are established; original contributions of major significance are not. Other previously claimed criteria are not pursued and not discussed. Fewer than three criteria; no formal final-merits step, with aggregate review noted.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source cover identifies an EB-1A/extraordinary-ability Form I-140 matter under INA section 203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL252016_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2016-07-25

Classification / field stated in source

researcher; EB-1A petition in sciences

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial. On appeal petitioner contests only original contributions; AAO says judging and scholarly authorship are established and rejects original contributions.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Judging and scholarly authorship are established; original contributions of major significance are not. Other previously claimed criteria are not pursued and not discussed. Fewer than three criteria; no formal final-merits step, with aggregate review noted.

What the AAO decision addressed

Judging and scholarly authorship are established; original contributions of major significance are not. Other previously claimed criteria are not pursued and not discussed. Fewer than three criteria; no formal final-merits step, with aggregate review noted.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — p. 3

Membership

Not considered — p. 3

Published material about the person

Not considered — p. 3

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5, p. 6, p. 7

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 2

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — p. 3

Leading or critical role

Not considered — p. 3

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — p. 3

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — p. 3

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petitioner is a researcher working across computer science, machine learning, and computational intelligence.; pages: 1

  • claim: On appeal he challenges only original contributions; other criteria are not maintained.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO finds judging and scholarly authorship established, but original contributions of major significance not established.; pages: 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7

  • claim: Decision states no formal final-merits determination is necessary and dismisses appeal.; pages: 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Computing sector research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL252016_01B2203