AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUL232014_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO finds awards, membership, original contributions, display, salary and commercial-success evidence insufficient; published material and judging criteria met, leaving fewer than three; no separate FMD.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical decision identifies an AAO appeal concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL232014_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 23, 2014 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; male model petitioner; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO expressly states that the required threshold of three evidentiary criteria was not established, so a separate formal final-merits determination was not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO finds awards, membership, original contributions, display, salary and commercial-success evidence insufficient; published material and judging criteria met, leaving fewer than three; no separate FMD.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 7 |
Published material about the person | met — p. 8 |
Judging the work of others | met — p. 8 |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — p. 5 |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not met — p. 8 |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner seeks EB-1A classification as a fashion model and claims awards, membership, published material, judging, display, salary and commercial-success criteria.; evidence_pages: 2; 3
claim: AAO finds published material and judging established; awards, membership, display, commercial success and high salary are not established.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10
claim: The decision concludes fewer than three regulatory categories are met and dismisses the appeal without formal final merits.; evidence_pages: 10; 11
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.