AAO research
EB-1A three-criterion threshold — AAO decision JUL182018_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL182018_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL182018_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2018-07-18 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO dismissed the appeal.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO dismissed the appeal.; director_findings: As distinguished in the source-specific basis. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The petitioner was a real-estate analyst/researcher. AAO found scholarly authorship and judging evidence met the relevant criteria, but found the claimed original contributions of major significance unsupported; the record did not establish the initial threshold and the appeal was dismissed.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]} |
Final-merits status | The petitioner was a real-estate analyst/researcher. AAO found scholarly authorship and judging evidence met the relevant criteria, but found the claimed original contributions of major significance unsupported; the record did not establish the initial threshold and the appeal was dismissed. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow comparison for real-estate research and the difference between authorship/judging and proof of original contributions’ major significance.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent and fact-specific; substantial redactions limit field details. Final merits was not reached after the initial threshold failed.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Major Significance research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.