AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUL182013_01B2203: appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL182013_01B2203: appeal dismissed. The appeal was dismissed; the conclusion discusses final merits conditionally, after noting failure to establish the antecedent three-criterion threshold.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision concerning a Form I-140 EB-1A petition under INA § 203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL182013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 18, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO decision concerning a Form I-140 petition for EB-1A classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal concerning an entertainment journalist; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO states the petitioner did not establish the antecedent three-criterion threshold and discusses final merits conditionally rather than making an independent final-merits finding. |
What the AAO decision addressed
evidence_pages: 22; 23; text: The appeal was dismissed; the conclusion discusses final merits conditionally, after noting failure to establish the antecedent three-criterion threshold.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | abandoned — p. 7 |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner worked in entertainment journalism and claimed to have developed an RSS text-feed service for mobile news distribution.; evidence_pages: 2; 8; 9
claim: The AAO found the RSS service evidence insufficient to establish original contributions of major significance; letters did not adequately document authorship, development, market impact, or attribution.; evidence_pages: 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14
claim: The AAO found the record did not establish a qualifying leading/critical role or significantly high salary, and declined comparable-evidence treatment.; evidence_pages: 16; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22
claim: The appeal was dismissed; the conclusion discusses final merits conditionally, after noting failure to establish the antecedent three-criterion threshold.; evidence_pages: 22; 23
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 2 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 3 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 4 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 5 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 6 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 7 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 8 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 9 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 10 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 11 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 12 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 13 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 14 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 15 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 16 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 17 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 18 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 19 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 20 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 21 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 22 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
PDF page 23 — Rendered source page visually inspected in sequence; legible.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.